______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Tue. Sep. 30, 2008

Never Look a Gift Dividend in the Mouth

Sometimes a cash rich company will declare a special one-time dividend to eliminate surplus cash. These special dividends are generally ignored when evaluating a company’s dividend growth performance. An example, of this would be Microsoft’s (MSFT) special $3.00/share dividend in 2005. Most analysts in-the-know exclude the $3.00/share special dividend use the $0.32/share regular dividend when calculating a dividend growth rate for Microsoft.

The situation is more complicated when a company distributes the excess cash via its regular dividend. Often, this leads to a situation where a company appears to have a dramatic increase in its dividend, then followed by decrease in the following year. Consider the following two companies I came across while running my D4L-PreScreen.xls model:

AT&T (T)

In 2002 T paid a dividend of $1.07/share, $1.37/share in 2003 and $1.25/share in 2004. Excluding the bump in 2003 there is a very smooth up-trend.

Avon Products Inc (AVP)

This one is a little more tricky when you look at the raw data. In 2003 AVP paid a dividend of $0.42/share, $0.70/share in 2004, $0.66/share in 2005 and $0.70/share in 2006. AVP saw a dramatic increase in 2004, with a slight pull back in 2005 and 2006 was flat with 2004.

Historically, when the companies lowered their dividends my approach would have been to sell the stocks if I owned them and exclude them from purchase consideration if I didn’t own them. As an investor with a long-term perspective, does this approach produce the desired results?

In both cases above, it would have been the wrong decision to sell the stock as a result of the companies lowering their dividend. A dividend investor should never look a gift dividend in the mouth and punish a company for its generosity. I will gladly take the extra cash when offered.

I have modified my analytical model to take the above situation into account. Specifically, I have introduced a new concept of “uptrend years.” An uptrend year ignores a decrease if the current year dividend is greater than 2-years prior, thus preserving the uptrend. A Star is now awarded for 10 or more uptrend years; one is deducted for less than 5. It is important to note that investing should never be purely a mechanical approach. An investor should always judge the unique facts and circumstances before making a trade.

Disclosure: No position in any of the aforementioned stocks.

Have future posts delivered to you for free!
If you enjoyed this post, please bookmark or share it here:
  • Print
  • email
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tipd
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
More on this topic (What's this?)
Ten Dividend Kings raising dividends for over 50 years
The ten year dividend growth requirement
Anticipating Dividend Increases
Read more on Dividends, Avon Products, Microsoft at Wikinvest

Related Posts:

Stock Analysis: V.F. Corp. (VFC) Stock Analysis: ProLogis (PLD) Priced for a Buy?

2 Responses to “Never Look a Gift Dividend in the Mouth”

  1. Dividend Growth Investor says:

    Speaking of special dividends check out NUE. They have a core dividend and an extra dividend which varies each quarter.

    I usually exclude special dividends in my analysis however..

  2. Dividends4Life says:

    DGI: I have looked at NUE (see Analysis Here.) The quarterly special dividends made the analysis difficult since I only considered the “regular” dividends.

    I liked NUE and may buy some in the future.

    Best Wishes,
    D4L

Leave a Reply