<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Winning Bank Stocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dividendsvalue.com/1467/two-winning-bank-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/1467/two-winning-bank-stocks/</link>
	<description>Dividend Investing &#38; Value Investing For A Superior Portfolio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:44:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dividend Growth Investor</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/1467/two-winning-bank-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-2740</link>
		<dc:creator>Dividend Growth Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/1467/two-winning-bank-stocks/#comment-2740</guid>
		<description>The thing I don&#039;t like about both banks is the high DPR (especially USB). They could be the most stable banks out there.. but that doesn&#039;t mean that there is further room for dividend growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I don&#8217;t like about both banks is the high DPR (especially USB). They could be the most stable banks out there.. but that doesn&#8217;t mean that there is further room for dividend growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dividends4Life</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/1467/two-winning-bank-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>Dividends4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/1467/two-winning-bank-stocks/#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>Anon: I think USB is a very effeciently run bank with a low cost structure. Their % Expense/Operating Revenue over the last 5 years ranged from a low of 44.3% in 2005 to a high of 49.6% in 2007.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For comps over the same period consider:&lt;br/&gt;BAC 47.9%-56.0%&lt;br/&gt;JPM 58.6%-97.7%&lt;br/&gt;C 72.2%-87.3%&lt;br/&gt;WFC 58.2%-64.8%&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Best Wishes,&lt;br/&gt;D4L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon: I think USB is a very effeciently run bank with a low cost structure. Their % Expense/Operating Revenue over the last 5 years ranged from a low of 44.3% in 2005 to a high of 49.6% in 2007.  </p>
<p>For comps over the same period consider:<br />BAC 47.9%-56.0%<br />JPM 58.6%-97.7%<br />C 72.2%-87.3%<br />WFC 58.2%-64.8%</p>
<p>Best Wishes,<br />D4L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/1467/two-winning-bank-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/1467/two-winning-bank-stocks/#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just curious what you identify as USBancorp&#039;s low cost advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just curious what you identify as USBancorp&#8217;s low cost advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
