<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Managing The Risk Of A Dividend Cut With Allocations *</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dividendsvalue.com/1510/managing-the-risk-of-a-dividend-cut-with-allocations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/1510/managing-the-risk-of-a-dividend-cut-with-allocations/</link>
	<description>Dividend Investing &#38; Value Investing For A Superior Portfolio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:45:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/1510/managing-the-risk-of-a-dividend-cut-with-allocations/comment-page-1/#comment-2969</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/1510/managing-the-risk-of-a-dividend-cut-with-allocations/#comment-2969</guid>
		<description>Okay thanks. I just ran a backtest on Folio for 5 years and O was the better performer, O returning 20.02% vs NLY with 11.09%. Based on past 5 year returns, it looks like O is the better performer.

I may do some more diligence on O, plus I like that they are returning income monthly, vs NLY which returns quarterly. I think NLY is a quality investment, but am always looking to improve.

I also agree about yield chasing, for me, raw yield % isn&#039;t the best indicator, and a yield that goes too high to me is an indicator of something that isn&#039;t sustainable.

Footnotes:

1) Folio says they use the &quot;... Mid-Weighted Dietz Method to calculate returns on a daily basis and a Unit Value Method to calculate the aggregate performance returns over various periods of time.&quot;

2) &quot;The performance of your holdings includes the reinvestment of cash distributions (dividends, capital gains, and return of capital)...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay thanks. I just ran a backtest on Folio for 5 years and O was the better performer, O returning 20.02% vs NLY with 11.09%. Based on past 5 year returns, it looks like O is the better performer.</p>
<p>I may do some more diligence on O, plus I like that they are returning income monthly, vs NLY which returns quarterly. I think NLY is a quality investment, but am always looking to improve.</p>
<p>I also agree about yield chasing, for me, raw yield % isn&#8217;t the best indicator, and a yield that goes too high to me is an indicator of something that isn&#8217;t sustainable.</p>
<p>Footnotes:</p>
<p>1) Folio says they use the &#8220;&#8230; Mid-Weighted Dietz Method to calculate returns on a daily basis and a Unit Value Method to calculate the aggregate performance returns over various periods of time.&#8221;</p>
<p>2) &#8220;The performance of your holdings includes the reinvestment of cash distributions (dividends, capital gains, and return of capital)&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

