<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progress Update &#8211; March 2009 *</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dividendsvalue.com/2722/progress-update-march-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/2722/progress-update-march-2009/</link>
	<description>Dividend Investing &#38; Value Investing For A Superior Portfolio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:45:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/2722/progress-update-march-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/?p=2722#comment-4056</guid>
		<description>Great Thanks D4L,

I was wondering if I was missing something there.  I have to look for KO trading at a discount :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Thanks D4L,</p>
<p>I was wondering if I was missing something there.  I have to look for KO trading at a discount <img src='http://dividendsvalue.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dividends4Life</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/2722/progress-update-march-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-4055</link>
		<dc:creator>Dividends4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/?p=2722#comment-4055</guid>
		<description>KJ: I chose KO over PEP based on valuation and allocation. At the time I purchased KO I held more PEP and needed to increase my position in KO. I purchased KO back on March 11th when it was trading 13.3% lower than where it is at today (PEP is up 11.1% over the same period). 

KO tends to drift into an &quot;overvalued&quot; state more often than PEP, so when it is undervalued, it is the time to buy. If I were buying today, it would be PEP. KO is back in an overvalued state again while PEP is trading at a discount.

Best Wishes,
D4L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KJ: I chose KO over PEP based on valuation and allocation. At the time I purchased KO I held more PEP and needed to increase my position in KO. I purchased KO back on March 11th when it was trading 13.3% lower than where it is at today (PEP is up 11.1% over the same period). </p>
<p>KO tends to drift into an &#8220;overvalued&#8221; state more often than PEP, so when it is undervalued, it is the time to buy. If I were buying today, it would be PEP. KO is back in an overvalued state again while PEP is trading at a discount.</p>
<p>Best Wishes,<br />
D4L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/2722/progress-update-march-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-4051</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/?p=2722#comment-4051</guid>
		<description>Hi D4L

I see you purchased more Coke (KO).  Why did you choose KO over Pepsi?  On a pure technical basis, the MMA Diff using the (price appreciate = Dividend Growth) shows that Pepsi is much better.  Pepsi has a Calc Div. Growth of 13.9% compared to Coke&#039;s 10.5%   This makes up for the small difference in yield.  Finally given the nearly same and flat Payout ratio in both companies, and Pepsi&#039;s higher EPS and revenue, I thought Pepsi would be the better of the two.  

What are you considering that I am not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi D4L</p>
<p>I see you purchased more Coke (KO).  Why did you choose KO over Pepsi?  On a pure technical basis, the MMA Diff using the (price appreciate = Dividend Growth) shows that Pepsi is much better.  Pepsi has a Calc Div. Growth of 13.9% compared to Coke&#8217;s 10.5%   This makes up for the small difference in yield.  Finally given the nearly same and flat Payout ratio in both companies, and Pepsi&#8217;s higher EPS and revenue, I thought Pepsi would be the better of the two.  </p>
<p>What are you considering that I am not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

