<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Procter &amp; Gamble Co. (PG) Dividend Stock Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dividendsvalue.com/3818/procter-gamble-co-pg-dividend-stock-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/3818/procter-gamble-co-pg-dividend-stock-analysis/</link>
	<description>Dividend Investing &#38; Value Investing For A Superior Portfolio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:44:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dividends4Life</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/3818/procter-gamble-co-pg-dividend-stock-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-12372</link>
		<dc:creator>Dividends4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/?p=3818#comment-12372</guid>
		<description>RHW: At one time I did use negative stars, but it complicated the system. As for PG&#039;s intangibles, I believe there is value in their intangibles (trade names, etc.) However, I am skeptical when all the intangible value is  in goodwill.

Best Wishes,
D4L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RHW: At one time I did use negative stars, but it complicated the system. As for PG&#8217;s intangibles, I believe there is value in their intangibles (trade names, etc.) However, I am skeptical when all the intangible value is  in goodwill.</p>
<p>Best Wishes,<br />
D4L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RHW</title>
		<link>http://dividendsvalue.com/3818/procter-gamble-co-pg-dividend-stock-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-12369</link>
		<dc:creator>RHW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendsvalue.com/?p=3818#comment-12369</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis.

I have to add that you may want to consider a &#039;negative stars&#039; aspect to your analysis.  I have yet to invest in PG due to its tangible book value, and would award it at least one negative star for this departure from reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis.</p>
<p>I have to add that you may want to consider a &#8216;negative stars&#8217; aspect to your analysis.  I have yet to invest in PG due to its tangible book value, and would award it at least one negative star for this departure from reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
