2009-Q4 Progress Review *
After each quarter-end I review my asset allocation and year-to-date total returns by category. The attached PDF contains my actual asset allocation as of 2009-Q4. Below is a high-level summary of the information contained in the PDF:
| Asset Allocation | Actual | Target | Diff. | |
| Cash/Fixed Income | 27.6% | 27.0% | 0.6% | |
| Equities-Domestic | 37.8% | 39.0% | -1.2% | |
| Equities-Internl | 23.3% | 24.0% | -0.7% | |
| Employer Equity | 11.3% | 10.0% | 1.3% | |
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
| Cash/Fixed Income | 27.6% | 27.0% | 0.6% | |
| Large Cap. | 46.2% | 48.0% | -1.8% | |
| Small/Mid Cap. | 14.9% | 15.0% | -0.1% | |
| Employer Equity | 11.3% | 10.0% | 1.3% | |
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
Asset Allocation
In the past, there have been three areas that I focused on from an asset allocation perspective: 1.) Employer/Company Stock, 2.) International Holdings and 3.) Cash/ Fixed Income Allocation. At the end of 2009, all three were relativity close to my targets. This is something I will continue to monitor and make adjustments as necessary.
2009-Q4 Performance
The forth quarter market improvement continued to be kind to my portfolio. After trailing the S&P through June, my income portfolio’s performance and the S&P swapped leads throughout the second half. Unfortunately, the year ended while the S&P had the lead. Below are the YTD performances of various categories along with my S&P 500 benchmark (VFINX):
| Portfolio | Wtd. Avg. | 2009 YTD | 2008 |
| Income Stocks | 1.8% | 23.9% | -20.4% |
| Pocket Change (9/08) | 14.0% | 21.1% | -7.3% |
| Income ETFs | -4.9% | 17.6% | -27.3% |
| Asset Allocation | 1.3% | 31.0% | -28.4% |
| Mutual Funds | -5.8% | 26.4% | -38.0% |
| S&P 500 (VFINX) | -4.9% | 26.5% | -36.3% |
| BRK.B | -15.0% | 2.2% | -32.1% |
| Income Stocks vs S&P | 6.7% | -2.6% | 15.9% |
| Income Stocks vs BRK | 16.7% | 21.7% | 11.7% |
When weighted with 2008, the Income Stocks, Pocket Change and Asset Allocation portfolios out-performed the S&P. The Income ETFs tied the S&P while the Mutual Funds portfolio under-performed it. As I have previously stated, it is my desire to beat the S&P over the long-run, so I don’t pay a lot of attention to short-term performance either positive or negative.
Passive Income
For Q4/2009 my passive income averaged $920/month, up slightly from the $714/month in Q3. The increase resulted from fewer dividend cuts in my non-income portfolios and stable interest rates on cash holdings. The above amounts include all sources of passive income in my taxable accounts, primarily interest and dividends. It excludes my Roth IRA, 401(k) and blog income (which is not passive).
The next update will be in mid-April. As always, thanks for reading!
(Photo: sanja gjenero)
| Cash/Fixed Income | 28.0% | 27.0% | 1.0% | |
| Equities-Domestic | 37.9% | 39.0% | -1.1% | |
| Equities-Internl | 23.5% | 24.0% | -0.5% | |
| Employer Equity | 10.6% | 10.0% | 0.6% | |
only american stocks in Q2 2010 the dividend with your Assets will bring $320 and in the Q3 $180 the american dollar weakens and you have to pay $1,62 for one Ca$
in 2011 some tax regulisations change
Give answers to the following questions
the dividend yield is important for me Yes NO
I have an ID and vote YES NO
i have more insurrance than necessary Y N
I believe what is written on internet Y N
I have enough money to pay everywhere a hospital bill Y N
What strategy do you use/follow for your non-dividend portfolio? Can you please explain the strategy?
As a whole, what is your overall strategy?
Thanks
@Handan: Outside of my income portfolio I primarily buy and hold indexed mutual funds. I use them to ensure that I meet my overall asset allocation. This portion of my investments is fairly automatic. I add new funds each month to the area that needs it the most and i reallocate once a quarter.
@european: Dividend yield is not the most important thing for me. I am an American citizen and I do vote. I have adequate insurance. Like anything else the internet contains truths and untruths. I have no hospital bill.
Best Wishes,
D4L
The S&P had the lead but slightly. I think risk adjusted you did very well.